Florian Krueger

Archive for the ‘2.0’ Category

Human 2 Data & Data 2 Human

In 2.0, IT, Management, The Future on September 10, 2015 at 12:18 pm

The Big Data/Business Intelligence Conundrum needs to be solved before the IoT takes off

Intro

Chicken and Egg, or is it? Clearly the Human was first, but does Data care? Nah, data thinks it can isolate itself and outlive humans by staying inaccessible. Has AI arrived without us realising? Is our way of live under threat?

Funny thoughts this morning, but there is a serious challenge the way I see it and the challenge is how to figure out how to make smarter –data based- decisions in the future.

Information wins, or does it?

I’m not saying you should, but if you think of business as war and you like brainy quotes, look at some of what Sun Tzu has said 2500 years ago:

“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.”

“If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles.”

“He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot, will be victorious.”

All of this suggests that you better know exactly what you are doing and you have all information readily available and made accessible, but you don’t have to be a die-hard strategist to see the value of data/information segmented in manageable, relevant chunks. Many smart people have seen the problem arising. Gertrude Stein for example said almost 70 years ago:

Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense.” T.S. Elliott puts it more philosophically, when he reflects: Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?”

All these quotes suggest that Information is and always has been out there and probably more information than can be easily consumed.

Because of the vast amount of information, people are getting scared and revert back to old habits that they feel comfortable with, meaning they make decisions based on Gut-Feel rather than on connecting various data-points. This can be fatal. In most cases it is as bad as someone suspecting a problem to be existential, but not going to the doctor.

You have a problem and you ignore it by not talking about it and relying on your gut feeling and instincts to work it out. Guess what: You won’t.

A Possible Approach

We –collectively- need to find ways of how to distil down information, make it consumable and package it in bite-size chunks, so that we don’t feel overwhelmed, but informed. Big Data is progressing with lightning speed and there is no end in sight. The challenge will get bigger not smaller. The Internet-of-Things is very, very close and will give Big-Data another boost. Information availability and reusability is already the basis for many new and coming businesses.

Because of this, innovation and other business cycles have gotten significantly shorter and most business has gone global with better-informed customers. Customers with higher expectations than ever before and with the ability to instantly validate what you are suggesting. You cannot outsmart the masses, but here is what you can do:

Look at your problem à Look at your desired outcome à Decide the components of success à Research the data and try and keep it 3C (Current, correct and complete) by assigning responsibility and KPI’s à Design a Data2Human interface that explains to you a maximum of 7 key points in a highly visual format à Educate and Train à Manage the Change

The real challenge here is that designing the Data2Human interface is not something that typically resides within an organisation as a core capability. Also there are a number of challenges along the way, before you even get to that point and they are always the same:

  • How do you find the data?
  • How do you validate the data?
  • How can you use tools that you already have and integrate with your future reporting dashboards?
  • How can you set alarms, identify trends, benchmark your performance, etc.?
  • How can you distinguish between different viewers and contributors?
  • Do you foster open collaboration, or do you need to keep information secure?

Where do we go from here?

Vendors of strategy solutions traditionally have answered some of the questions above. They have been looking at it from an architecture perspective, tried to put blueprints in place, or segmented information into portfolios to make it easier to manage. Few have succeeded.

In many cases they haven’t succeeded because the problem is not a technical one. It is a very human problem. It is about the fear of change, it is about the fear of the unknown and it is about reluctance to change and the preference to stay with the status quo.

But the good news is that there are now tools and techniques that have been developed over the past 2-6 years that can interpret information and can genuinely support that change. Also, companies have learned about this soft side and the implementation of such tools and the supporting communication has genuinely improved.

Companies, such as IntentHQ put AI into social intelligence and make sense of big data for the first time, to support decision makers in marketing and general management, EnergyDeck allows to understand trends and set alerts to create sustainable strategies for Facility Managers and companies, again based in IoT-ready Big Data. Firms such as StrategyBlocks, now allow you to put everything into perspective for the first time and service providers start to understand more and more about managing the soft side.

But first things first: If you as an organisation feel overwhelmed, go through the simple steps above and try to focus on the relevant information. Use common sense and the Pareto principle to get started and then look at tools that make your life easier, as they store data and maintain the right level of accuracy to foster change and to support innovation.

More and more data and information at an ever-faster pace will create an exciting new world and we are starting to getting a handle on Data, but always remember: We were there first!

 

HAL 9000 over and out…..

Advertisements

Buzz Alarm – Hype Notice – Social CRM – Truth or Fiction?

In 2.0, CRM, Management on October 30, 2009 at 9:21 pm

First of all THANKS. Thanks to the SugarCRM guys and Larry Augustin, for hosting an open-source-community event and for inviting people with real nice catering and the lot, at a time where many old-school companies wouldn’t even want to pay for a cup of coffee.

Larry Augustin & Florian Krueger

Well, hang on – maybe it is not despite the fact that SugarCRM has an open-source community -that they can afford things like that- but because of it? Maybe open-source is simply the model of the future?
I’m convinced that this is the case. IP is no property any longer, but a commodity, same as information and air. Restrictions on IP are ridiculous. Innovation combined with flexibility and the ability to implement changes will be the differentiators between failure and success in the future.
Well now the chief concern officers will say, how can you innovate, if you are lacking the funding which was formerly generated by selling your IP?

Obviously you can’t. At least you can’t in the traditional way. You need to rethink and reinvent your business model.

Why? Because you are already making less profit and profits will go down furthermore. Funding is not always clear, but as innovation is more and more outsourced to the customers, or the communities which you operate, manage or contribute to, the entire business model is shifting. A company which has earned money before through, say subscriptions might find itself managing communities of people that share some interests. Obviously this will again not only change the revenue stream, or the value chain, this will force the company to reinvent itself.

All right now Florian, all this and not one word on social CRM? Wroooong…. All this was on social CRM, or whatever you want to call it. Social CRM, CRM2.0, or Social Media Management in the context with customer relations is all about the dear old Trinity of People, Processes and Technology – with one slight difference: People are now really in the beginning and everywhere until the end. Processes don’t need to be described only, or automated. Processes need to be so sophisticated that they can self adjust through the right measure of real-time web applications or other sophisticated BI tools. Without -as SugarCRM calls them- “Cloudconnectors” a CRM is not worth the energy required for switching the server on. Other than that, Technology can do what you can dream. Therefore the only question is: can you still dream?

…and the reality is, Processes need to support people in a holistic, immediate, proactive and such a wonderful way that your customers will stick with you. Then it’s not about what you are charging anymore, but about what kind of feeling and emotions your company is able to transport and to co-create.
This is something you can only influence when you see the full picture. People long for business friendships, they long for someone who knows them and with whom they can share their thoughts. Without the ability to dig into the networks and to establish that social competence, a CRM looses any right to exist. It can support your old school model for a couple of years, but due to its misconception, it will lead you down a road without return. When you wake up, you will look around and notice that you have slept one year too long.

I can’t tell you how curious I am, how this thinking will be adopted by the average CEO, who either is a lawyer, chemist, mathematician or has a degree in engineering. This has nothing to do with clear, well defined processes anymore. It must be comparable to the experience one has when he steps out of his Maybach and now has to win a bull-riding competition. SocialCRM IMHO is just the dawning of a new set of integrated tools forming Mash-Ups in the Cloud and helping us, as customers to manage ourselves. We will find the products we are interested in and we as customers will judge and decide whom we want to deal with. It is the ultimate democracy and Graham Hill was right comparing it in its importance with the era of enlightenment itself.

So to conclude, this is a first glimpse at the future therefore it is fiction, but it is so close to becoming reality that you can call it truth.
To be continued…

Don Tapscott and Florian Krüger in Munich

In 2.0, Events, Management, Uncategorized, Wikinomics on October 22, 2009 at 1:47 pm

The only interesting bits about the event in Munich were the keynote speaches and a couple of nice contacts, like meeting up with Professor Scheer again.

Don Tapscott, August-Wilhelm Scheer and Florian Krueger

Don Tapscott, August-Wilhelm Scheer and Florian Krueger

It is a shame that the once largest IT show in the south of Germany has been denoted to a gathering of likeminded IT Guru’s. We need to do something about it. Innovation has been mentioned in numerous posts and speeches of mine as being the key to success or even survival in Central Europe. Like it or not, besides Biotech (aka the Nano-Guys) IT will remain the main driver behind any meaningful change project in the years to come.
An IT fair therefore should have the governments highest attention and support. Instead, the Bavarian Head-of-State decides to fight about coalition non-issues to foster the power of the local party in Berlin. Well…

Enough complaining, the real take-away from this fair was positive, there are many smart people around and good ideas that have been discussed. Don has certainly given the people a lot to think about and input -such as his- is crucially important to the German Leadership. Everybody knows that Flickr is more successful than Kodak’s EasyShare, but has everyone embraced the idea and made it a part of his reinvention / change programme? What does it mean that communities and “Curators of Content” are so much more important than the pure providers of information?
Has every company / organisation thought and I mean really thought about the desires, dreams and fears of their clients? How they can be managed in the best, philantrophic way and how they can then ultimately be so well tied to the organisation that loyalty exceeds temptation…

What I also liked a lot was to see how innovative some of the perceivedly conservative companies such as Giesecke & Devrient are. They are humming happily behind all these megatrends, which are about to come such as 4th generation networks and developing the tools for success, without the larger audience even knowing that they exist, or what it exactly is they are doing. I have to admit, I was impressed by some of their thinking.

And finally it was great to meet the folks from BITKOM and especially Thomas Mosch, who does a stellar job in Berlin for the entire industry.

So, at the end of the day the overall impression is really positive, but there’s still a long way to go for Europe, before we can relax and enjoy our achievements. Let’s Go!

New Ideas for old Problems

In 2.0, Common Sense, Management on September 18, 2009 at 2:00 pm

As time goes by…

Companies and moreover people wait to see what is happening. Well nothing will happen when everyone waits. We have to shape our own future and our future will be what we envision. Therefore we need to understand the tasks and challenges which are evolving and more importantly take immediate action.

According to Analysts, markets are shifting, or floating. There are global markets, dealing with specific ideas, requirements, or opportunities, which are not bound to any limitations as they once were. E-Lancing is harnessing the power of Outsourcing and combines it with the Power of Crowdsourcing. Clickworking – as a modern form of Slavery – currently is the last chance for many unemployed people to earn any money at all.

Professionals which are not adapting at the speed of light will be left behind. Creating an own brand through Blogging and Microblogging and the constant usage of all existing tools, such as Social Media and Professional Networks are the prerequisites to the creation of any noteworthy opportunity to develop oneself or any brand for that matter. What used to be Alumni networks, is becoming interest groups, so highly individualized that only a handful of people might be in the same one at one time. More interesting are the overlaps between different interest groups and synergies resulting out of these. People with a bigger, or multiple presence can be found easier and get more credibility when promoting services, or themselves.

On top of all that market conditions, as they are associated with these global ‘Floating Markets’ are moving east. Europe becomes more and more like the US, the US more and more like Asia and Asia becomes what Europe once was. This is driven by basic survival instincts and supported by information now readily available all over the globe. Why should an Indian outsourcer with the same qualifications earn less than his Siberian counterpart? Why should a Malaysian programmer earn less than his Chinese colleague? As costs of living will equalize the last excuse will be removed and things will level out to an extend where geography will matter less and less.

As a European myself, I see our only chance to develop a sustainable business model in Innovation. Innovation is a valuable good which we can only afford when we have to things: time and high quality education – and this requires some level of commitment, if not dedication. Dedication needs to come from the Governments, but also from our students. They need to understand that their only chance to maintain their standard of living will be to work harder and learn more than their global competitors.

Long story short, as time goes by, we need to lay the foundation for our future wellbeing now. We need to act on what we feel is necessary and dare to take risks, despite the economic challenges. If we hunker down and try to wait it out, the only thing that will happen is that we will lose our slight advantage on innovational capacity and while we do act on this understanding we will need to make it clear to everyone that this is the one chance we’ve got.

Review Your Calculus of Cost

In 2.0, Management on August 7, 2009 at 9:08 am

As recently as a year or so ago, much of management’s attention was trained on growth and how to generate sustained performance over the long term.  In some cases, cost control took a back seat, with cost patterns masked by year-over-year increases in the top line.  In the 2009 economy, however, cost management is again front and centre, critical to short-term recovery and long-term success.

Companies must now focus on cost control, and that presents an opportunity to tune the business to today’s economic realities.  But we cannot cost-cut our way to renewed prosperity, and how we handle cost control today may well determine how fast prosperity returns.  The challenge is to measure accurately the corporation’s complex array of costs, understand their drivers and patterns, and control them in ways that won’t restrict the company on the way up as markets strengthen and growth returns to the agenda.

Now is the time to review your calculus of cost, the science and strategy of effective and forward-looking cost management.  Below are nine questions CEOs and their executives teams should be asking now – and regularly – about costs.  And as you ask them, keep in mind the overarching question: how complete, accurate and informative are our cost measurements to begin with?

1.   What is the exact cost of doing business with each of our customers?
2.   Are we losing business by causing unnecessary costs for our customers, or taxing ourselves by generating unnecessary costs for our suppliers?
3.   Do we still have the right mix of evaluation criteria in our investment and programme management decisions?
4.   Do we build ‘optionality’ into our major investment decisions of all kinds?
5.   Are we managing our talent cost in ways that maintain business capability and employee engagement?
6.   What categories of our expense do not move in concert with revenue, and why?
7.   What should we simply stop doing?
8.   Are we exploiting the learning curve to drive down unit and project costs?
9.   Can we use our cost performance as a differentiator or competitive weapon?

To manage costs well they must be examined in a methodical, objective and data-driven manner.  Anticipatory and analytical cost management works no matter where you are in the business cycle.

This is an extract from our Boardroom Imperative Review your Calculus of Cost.  A copy of the full document can be downloaded from our website.

Don Tapscott live in London

In 2.0, Wikinomics on July 31, 2009 at 9:41 am

Just in case you missed it. Our Guru made it to London and talked about 2.0. I love the video, as it shows some of our abilities from a thought provoking perspective. You can have access to these, our abilities by just asking me for support. You will be surprised how detailed our ideas are from a practical perspective.

Here is the link

Zappos and Amazon Sitting in a Tree… by Laura Carrillo

In 2.0, Wikinomics on July 31, 2009 at 9:29 am

Last week Amazon announced the acquisition of online apparel and footwear retailer ZapposThe Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that Amazon shelled out an impressive $847 Million for Zappos, a company most well known for its impeccable customer service and outstanding employee satisfaction. The company even pays new employees to leave if after completing new hire training they are not 100% on-board with the position and culture of the company. If you are not familiar with this unorthodox approach this ABC clip provides a good overview of the culture that Zappos has developed. So the outstanding question about this acquisition is – Who will be leading the customer experience strategy? Will Zappos teach Amazon a few things about customer and employee experience or will Zappos adopt more of the Amazon style?

 

Fortunately, both companies are run by astute and innovative CEOs who are very customer-focused and known for stepping up and openly communicating with the pubic and their employees. For example, as soon as the acquisition news broke, the CEO of Zappos, Tony Hsieh, sent an email out to employees addressing the transaction and primary questions that he assumed they would have. He also assured them that the relationship will help both companies grow and that they would be keeping their culture and teams intact. Not only was the letter sent out via email, but in true 2.0 fashion a blog post was immediately created looking for questions, comments and feedback from employees, customers, basically anyone. To date the majority of comments have been positive in nature with a few customers looking for assurance that the “Zappos way” will not go away. As one Zappos and Amazon customer said: “Amazon is good, but Zappo’s is GREAT!” I believe that this is the general consensus and that Zappos customers will be extremely disappointed should service quality slip at all moving forward.

 

On the public front, Amazon’s CEO, Jeff Bezos dealt with a fairly public blunder last week when some copies of George Orwell’s book 1984 and a few other novels were remotely deleted from individual’s Kindles after it was realized that they were illegally sold. Ironically, a very Big Brother thing to do with a book about Big Brother. Recognizing the backlash that the move had caused with customers, Bezos immediately issued an apology on the Amazon Kindle community. Bezos said “Our “solution” to the problem was stupid, thoughtless, and painfully out of line with our principles.” To date there are over 570 responses to the apology with many customers posting that they understood that Amazon was put in a tough spot and stated how appreciative they were for Bezos personally stepping up to communicate with them. Zappos, which has masterfully conquered social media tools like Twitter could be a great partner in moving Amazon further along in their use of social media to deal with issues like this. Hsieh himself has over 1 million Twitter followers and tweets consistently about everything from company news to his personal thoughts and favorite quotes.

 

Even though all public communications state that Zappos will remain operating independently, you have to believe that there will be at least some disruption. Hopefully for Zappos employees and customers that will be minimal and both company leaders will continue the transparent dialogue with all stakeholders. Given both companies’ alignment with social media it won’t take long for any customer and employee issues to surface publicly, so managing the challenges that are inevitable in any merger or acquisition is crucial. Many questions will only be answered over time. What do you think? Did Zappos make the right move? Will Zappos be able to maintain its service levels and culture now that it is part of a larger entity? Will Amazon customers expect Amazon to adjust its service to meet the level that Zappos has set with its own customers?

If you want to read more, you can go to here.

Success (and Failure) Factors for Web 2.0

In 2.0, Survey on July 9, 2009 at 1:42 pm

Web 2.0 tools, technologies and applications offer significant opportunities for organisations to share knowledge, improve performance and engage employees. But the technologies are still new to many, and mistakes and improper use of social networks, instant messaging, wikis, blogs, microblogs and other applications can derail the promise of collaboration, transparency and productivity.

To help understand the success and failure factors for Web 2.0 use we have just launched a research project. If you have been following, or trying to promote or manage, the use of Web 2.0 tools for business purposes in your organisation, we’d very much like your input. Participation simply involves completing an on-line survey. All responses are kept confidential and we will be reporting on the results later in the year.

Please send me an email to florian@floriankrueger.com to register for the survey.

Ok, so I am a German and nothing in Deutsch?

In 2.0, Common Sense, IT on July 2, 2009 at 6:32 pm

Falsch, natuerlich lasse ich es mir nicht entgehen auch meinen Senf auf deutsch dazuzugeben. Immerhin beschraenkt sich das Blog ja nicht auf meinen Wohnort und der ist momentan ohnehin im Flieger.

Was treibt mich um und warum ist das was ich schreibe fuer den Leser potentiell relevant? Well, gar nicht, wenn der Leser kein CEO, CIO, COO, CTO, oder sonstwie im gehobenen Management ist, weil ich es selbst bei groesster Selbstbeherrschung nicht schaffe beim Bullshit Bingo nicht mitzuspielen.

Der Bereich in dem ich micht bewege liegt irgendwo im nirgendwo, naemlich genau zwischen dem “Business” und der “IT”. Auf der einen Seite haben wir CEO’s, welche der Meinung sind, dass heute technisch ohnehin alles moeglich ist und die auch nicht davor zurueckschrecken, den Scope nach 50% der Projeklaufzeit um 180 Grad zu drehen und auf der anderen Seite haben wir CIO’s, welche nach einer erfolgreichen 20-jaehrigen Laufbahn in der IT und deren Management wissen, dass Sie ohnehin die besseren CEO’s waeren und die Notwendigkeiten des “Business” viel besser beurteilen koennen, als ebendiese…

Das lieber Leser, ist ein Problem von dem ich glaube, dass es so alt ist wie die Menschheit selbst. Fremdbild und Selbstbild sind seltenst 100% identisch und koennen es auch nicht sein. Ich denke der Weise erkennt seine Fehler und laesst sich helfen. Hilfe muss auch nicht immer von einem Berater wie mir kommen, oftmals reichen Freunde (Keine Freibiergesichter, sondern FREUNDE), oder noch besser Familie vollkommen aus.

Ich habe mir mal den Spass gemacht letztes Jahr ein sogenanntes “Common Sense Reference Model” zu basteln, in welchem bei saemtlichen Entscheidungsprozesses auf bestehende Faehigkeiten und gesunden Menschenverstand referenziert wird. Sie wuerden sich wundern, wie viel man damit hinbekommt.

Das zweite grosse Thema was mich seit mehreren Jahren umtreibt, ist das Thema Nachhaltigkeit, oder “Sustainability”. Nachhaltigkeit im planerischen Sinne darf sich keinstenfalls auf oekologische Aspekte reduzieren, sondern muss oekonomische und soziale Themen gleichwertig mitbehandeln. Die Tatsache, dass keine Firma, welche mir bisher ueber den Weg gelaufen ist, wirklich ein allumfassendes Nachhaltigkeitsprogramm zum Leben erweckt hat, stimmt mich traurig und erklaert in meinen Augen zu einem grossen Teil, wieso die Wirtschaft da ist wo sie ist.

Wer mich kennt hat’s schon oft gehoert: Wir in Europa, sind die Einzigen, welche eine reiche Geschichte besitzen und die Faehigkeit,sowie die Erlaubnis haben, diese zu reflektieren. Daraus sind tolle Sachen entstanden, wie die Aufklaerung, oder die Demokratie, um nur zwei Besipiele zu nennen. Daraus wiederum resultiert die Verantwortung, aus dieser Geschichte Lehren zu ziehen und das Gelernte umzusetzen. Ausser schoenen Worten habe ich bisher noch nicht viel gesehen. Wer mich davon ueberzeugt, dass seine Firma anders ist, hat die Wahl zwischen meinen drei Lieblingsgerichten: Kaesefondue, Spanferkelbraten, oder Haeggis… Pick one und danke fuers Lesen…

Ihr Florian Krueger

Parents of Net Geners — A New Factor for Employers to Consider

In 2.0 on July 2, 2009 at 6:04 pm

Highly involved parents have followed the ‘Net Gens’ through every stage of life: challenging poor grades, helping their children choose a college — and choosing among prospective employers. A rising tide of parents are ‘hovering’ over their twenty-something child’s job search and early employment, contacting employers to complain, cajole and lobby on behalf of their son or daughter. And although the data quoted below is from a North American study — there is no reason to believe that the same phenomenon isn’t occurring in Europe.

Parents most often get involved by gathering information about prospective employers — 40% of employers have had parents gather employment information for their children. Nearly one-third of employers have seen parents submit a résumé on their child’s behalf. Over one quarter of employers have had parents advocate their children for a position, and 15% have had parents call to complain if the company does not hire their son or daughter.

Employers report that fathers are more likely than mothers to get involved in negotiations when a son or daughter is not hired or is being disciplined by an employer. Mothers, on the other hand, are more likely to collect information on the company and arrange for company visits and interviews.

Which employers are most affected?

Some kinds of employers encounter helicopter parents more than others. Levels of parental involvement differ based on an employer’s size, location, recruitment tactics and the type of positions they offer — as well as on the socio-demographics of the family. According to the 2007 Michigan State University survey, four situations experience the most interaction with parents:

  1. Large employers with regional and national brand recognition
    Parents feel that their children could get lost at a large, brand name company, whereas a small, intimate workplace will provide the personal mentoring they have come to expect for their children. Smaller companies are also more likely to be local, so the parents of employees may know them personally and be less likely to seek out information and get involved.
  2. Employers with strong internship programmes
    Parents know that many companies use their internship programmes to develop long-term relationships with prospective employees, and want to fully investigate any company that may affect their child’s long-term future. Interns also tend to be younger than entry-level employees and therefore draw more intense protection from parents.
  3. More affluent families — especially from urban areas
    Where parents have invested large sums of money in their child’s education they may feel an entitlement to negotiate so their child’s career takes off on the ‘right foot’. And urban areas tend to be ahead of rural areas in many ‘Net Gen’ trends, from rising school achievement to falling substance abuse and risk-taking.
  4. Positions in marketing and sales
    Employers see higher parental involvement in these functions than those filling engineering, research and administration positions. It is possible that parents whose children work in marketing, human resources and sales positions intervene more because these careers have higher outcome uncertainty. These are also alpha-personality careers, which may have been pushed on their children by alpha-personality parents — the ones who are most likely to intervene with employers.

Are you a helicopter parent or have you experienced it in your organisation?

You can comment on this article or ask a question on the nGenera Community.

This is extracted from our report Helicopter Parents in the Workplace, which forms part of our Talent 2.0 programme. If you are interested in reading more on this topic please contact Suzanne Churchett to request a copy of the full paper.